http://theamericancritic.com/categories/rss/TravelLatest Articles Posted on The American Critic Filed Under TravelLatest Articles Posted on The American Critic Filed Under Travel
Let me know what you think? thanks]]>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:37:40 PDT1270517860Please check out this video after reading this story:

http://vimeo.com/2471559

When friends and family ask me how my mission trip to Africa was I find myself at a loss for words. For those who know me, you may find that hard to believe. And still, weeks after being home I cannot fully wrap my head around the entire experience. I know that whatever I try to say or write will forever fall short of capturing the depressing, humbling, and inspiring feelings I had in Malawi. I will instead share my favorite story from the trip. A story that brings a smile to my face no matter how I am feeling. A story that not only confirmed my faith in Jesus but brought me home in a place that was not my own.


In Malawi my girlfriend, Christy, and I were working with Children of the Nations, a nonprofit organization that brings hope to the hopeless and gives children a fighting chance. Through COTN you can sponsor a child for less than a dollar a day and truly make a difference in his or her lives. Seeing this on TV never brought the importance of sponsorship home for me; in fact I used to change the channel.

All that changed for me in the village of Mgwayi. That is where I met Thomas, a smart, 11- year-old boy that I swear will be a teacher if not the President of Malawi someday. With his round face and glowing eye’s, you could see the hunger for learning inside this humble 8th grader. The entire time we were together he would call me, “My friend, Christopher,” while he was teaching me words in Chichewa. As we walked together, he would have one hand in his pocket while holding the other in the air like a waiter balancing a tray of drinks, as he would intently quiz me on the words he taught me the day before. I remember telling Christy that I would love for us to sponsor Thomas but after looking into it we found that he was not in the program. When push comes to shove all of these children need to be sponsored but COTN does a great job of putting into order the children that are in the most need. Although we were sad we couldn’t sponsor Thomas we felt good knowing that he was in school and had a family.


I had an emotional goodbye with Thomas the day before we left. He came to see me play in the “big soccer game” even though the field was a great distance from his village. When the game was over I saw him standing by the sidelines looking for me. We walked all the way back to the COTN camp holding each other’s hand. With his free hand he made the motion of a plane and asked if I was leaving for America. “Come back soon, my friend Christopher.” I told him I would but only if he stayed in school. We embraced and as I entered the gates of the COTN compound I turned back to see him standing there; no shoes, torn shirt, wearing his Chicago Bulls cap, waving goodbye until I was out of sight.

After learning that we could not sponsor Thomas, Christy told me about Jack. (Jackson) I saw firsthand the consequences of malnutrition in Jack. He is a 4 year old that looks like he’s 2. He didn’t talk at all but he crept into our hearts with his furrowed brow, baby cheeks, and his lips that seemed to be frozen in a constant pout. When we asked about Jack we were told that, unlike Thomas, we would be able to sponsor him and that we should meet his parents. We were both so excited. Upon meeting Jack’s Father, Gilibati (Gilbert) and Mother, Khricy (Krissy) we came to learn that Gilibati was the chief of Mgwayi. He just so happened to be doing concrete work in his house and having years of concrete experience, I was glad to help. Although there was a language barrier we could work together just fine and I felt a sense of pride rush through me as I helped out in the house of the child we would be sponsoring. Their house was built like all the others in the village, made out of dried mud bricks with dirt floors, although their house was bigger than most of the others we had seen, about 600sqft. After we finished working we said goodbye to Jack and his family. There were 8 children in all. From oldest to youngest: Matilda, Judith, Fikinla, Kingsley, Khricy, Precious, Jackson, and a new born baby that had yet to be named. She was a beautiful baby girl, only 3 weeks old.


The next day we were told by Davey and Pike (COTN workers that put everything they have into getting these children sponsors) that there had been a mix up. Jack already had a sponsor. I could tell by looking at Christy’s face that we felt the same way. At first you are saddened to learn you cannot sponsor this child and yet you are excited that they are already being helped. We then asked Davey about the newborn baby we had met the day before. Davey asked us what her name was and we told them that she didn’t have one. He explained to us that in Malawi it is customary that the child be named by a relative from another village. With no cell phone or email this can take up to 3-4 weeks. Another reason for not naming babies is because the infant mortality rate is so high. Davey told us that he would go personally that day and get the baby registered into the program so we could sponsor her. He then told us that we may be able to name her. With no hesitation Christy and I told Davey that we would be honored if they named her Kathleen, after my Mother.


This is where the story hits me the hardest. My Mother passed away from Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on April 22nd, 2007, 4 days before I had met Christy. Christy was my rock through that entire time and it has always bothered us that she was unable to meet my Mother. To give you even more insight, I was raised Christian but I stopped going to Church and to be honest, after my Mom died, I lost my faith completely. It wasn’t until I met Christy that all that changed. She would tell me that she was going to Church and I would grumble and tell her to have a good time. She never forced me to go. She just showed me the door and let me know that it was always open. So I went to Summit Church a few times, and then a few more times after that. I found myself, for the first time in my life, feeling comfortable in a church. I felt like this place got it right and the more I dove in the more I got back. The more I walked towards Jesus the more the pain of losing my Mother disappeared. I found that, even though I still had many questions about Jesus and the church, my heart was open. Without Christy and Summit Church in my life I would have never gone to Africa.

We were able to sponsor that baby girl and her name is Kathleen Gilibati. Standing there under an African Sky, a little under a year and a half after my Mother had left this world, Christy and I found each other involved in a child’s life and her name was my Mother’s. Seeing Christy hold Kathleen brought me full circle. The woman I love was holding a child that we named after the other woman I loved. What had been a heart breaking ending turned into a heart breaking beginning. What broke God’s heart broke mine.


People often say that God works in mysterious ways and I never understood that before. Not until I went half way around the world did I learn what that truly meant. Kathleen’s picture hangs on our wall and we pray for her, hoping that she is blessed with a wonderful life. Through God, we were able to meet Thomas, Jack and Kathleen and they showed us that sometimes you have to leave your home to come home. You have to open your heart to what He wants you to see and feel.
]]>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:14:40 PST1229026480 After September 11, 2001, the United States was forced to examine its national security and in particular airport security. Knowing that terrorists could get through our airports without being intercepted terrified the country. In response, the U.S. spent billions of dollars in an attempt to tighten airport security. While changes were made, reports show that airports are not really much safer. The United States needs to take every step necessary to insure that people fly safely. Some may argue that having more security in airports means an invasion of privacy and even more inconvenience. However, I believe that the safety of flyers is worth some sacrifices. The current airport security is not sufficient, and if we do not do everything we can to increase security, we risk another attack.
The security system in our airports is somewhat decent, as it has prevented some dangerous situations; however, it is lacking components that could greatly improve overall safety. As of now, security at most airports includes layers of protection, starting with outside security such as fences, barriers, guard stations, and security cameras. Regulations for parked cars prevent people from detonating bombs near the terminals. Once inside the airport, there are identification or passport checks, metal detectors, and X-ray machines for both carry-on items and checked luggage. When a person is acting suspiciously, an airport may a use CT scanner (which is like an X-ray machine, but more efficient and slower) or dogs that are trained to sniff out bombs. Rules prohibiting certain carry-on items and the occasional air marshal are security the precautions in place for once you are on the plane. In addition, background checks are required for all airport employees, insuring potentially dangerous people are not hired. These measures are all needed; however, the fact of the matter is these procedures are not strong enough on their own.
Airports are unsafe, and it should not take another attack for the people and government of the U.S. to realize that. Recent tests give all the necessary proof. A 2004 report by the Government Accountability Office shows there are difficulties in fully staffing screening checkpoints, which could lead to inefficiencies in airport security. In addition, a 2002 investigation by the Department of Homeland Security�s inspector general found that during an eight-month period, 753 cases of air marshal transgression occurred, including sleeping and being drunk while on the job. According to security experts, many threats are ignored. For example, many baggage handlers, mechanics, and other technicians are not screened or searched. This means that people with access to airplanes could get away with coming to work with explosives, and nothing is being done about it. One of the most shocking instances of airport security failure was when undercover investigators smuggled all the necessary parts to a bomb onto airplanes. The smuggled parts include a detonator, liquid explosives, and liquid incendiary components. According to the report, screening officers seemed to be following the proper procedure and using the appropriate technology in most cases, however they still failed to intercept the bomb. In a similar test with similar results performed by internal TSA investigators in 2006, screeners missed seventy-five percent of simulated explosives and bomb parts hidden under investigators� clothes or in carry-on bags at the Los Angeles International Airport, sixty-five percent at Chicago O�Hare International Airport, and twenty percent at San Francisco International Airport. These statistics are deplorable and need to be improved drastically. San Francisco did a decent job at intercepting the explosives in comparison to Los Angeles and Chicago; however, twenty percent should not be acceptable. All it takes is one bomb to pass through and lives are likely to be lost.
Though we have poured so much money into airport security, there is still so much more we need to improve. One precaution we could implement is the use of biometrics for both crew and passengers. A biometric system would check fingerprints, retinas, or facial patterns. This would insure that people are who they say they are, and it would tell if a person is on a potential terrorist list. The crew would also need to be checked before entering secure areas. To improve flight safety, it is unacceptable that air marshals are drunk or sleeping while on duty. Besides cracking down on air marshals, they need to be on more flights. As of now, air marshals are only on five percent of flights in the United States. It should be that when one gets on a flight, chances are, an air marshal is on the plane. In addition to a biometric system, the Silicon Valley Task Force suggests airports adopt improved video monitoring, better airport communications, and more security checkpoints. Most importantly, these procedures, those that are in place and those I have proposed, must be strictly enforced. If they are not stringent and compulsory, then they will not be effective in protecting flyers.
Some people may be against putting in new security measures and enforcing both new and old for a few reasons: inconvenience, invasion of privacy and costs. It is in my opinion that no amount of time or money is worth risking lives. I am willing to stand in line, have my bags thoroughly checked, and pay money if that will help to prevent another terrorist attack. People should be willing to make sacrifices for safety, otherwise people may be sacrificed for convenience. I think people do not realize how necessary it is. There are people all over the world who dislike the United States and want to hurt us. If there is something we can do to prevent another September 11, then we should. The army is overseas risking their lives for our freedom and safety, and sometimes we civilians have to make sacrifices and do our part as well.
Reforms are necessary in airports if people want to be confident that they are flying safely. Our airports are still vulnerable to terrorist attacks, even with the current security system. There have been numerous reports after September 11, 2001 that show our airport security is insufficient. Many improvements could be made to the security of our airports, and it is important that they be strictly enforced. There is no reason we should take this issue lightly, as it is our own lives at risk.
]]>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:25:39 PST1196907939Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:40:23 PST1196707223