Print Article
Email to a Friend
 

More GOP B.S.!

avatar by ryan29
January 27th, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Filed under: Politics
Just so I am clear, The GOP in the last weeks of the Bush Presidency spent TWO TRILLION DOLLARS to bail out Wall Street and the rest of these jerk off companies who wasted OUR money on futures and speculative trading and basically caused this 2nd great Depression we are in today. When I read that our new leader Obama, who lo and behold, actually has ideas that might work to jump start our economy and put money in the hands of AMERICANS, rather than seedy businesses. What's the hold up you ask? Oh it is just a few Republican jerkoff's who think the President is doing enough for private interests groups! Excuse me, but private interest groups are what got us here in the first place. Let me say this one more time, if you vote republican and you DON'T make six figures, you are a moron! These people must have ignored the Liberal mandate that passed when Obama destroyed McCain. Again we already tried the conservative approach, and it was a FAILURE! Wake up people and start paying attention, are we really going to let a couple misguided fucks like the GOP tell us how our country needs to be run? I say Thee Nay!




Rate this Article

Flag this Article

Miscategorized Spam Inappropriate
 
 
 

Submit a Critique

 

Critiques

Show Oldest First
 
avatar Retired_Navy_Rob on February 9th, 2009 at 3:02 PM
 

of course you don't care your another of those neo conservatives with short memories who think that Bush was a great man!

No I’m actually an old conservative. I’ve been voting conservative since you were shitting green. So listen to Air America and try to learn a new catch phrase. I voted for Reagan and I am old enough to remember the mess of the Carter administration. Now I’m too young to be a Goldwater conservative so compared to that I guess I’m “NEO.” But anyway I blame both parties. As far as Bush goes I feel he was an OK President not my personal favorite but there has been better and worst.

avatar ryan29 on February 9th, 2009 at 1:50 PM
 

was it not the Republicans who got us into this mess? Yes. of course the Democrats had to vote for it! what was the other choice: to let those banks fail? it changes nothing that over the 8 years of the bush regime, they was so little oversight and so much deregulation that it allowed those financial companies to screw over the american people. of course you don't care your another of those neo conservatives with short memories who think that Bush was a great man!

avatar Retired_Navy_Rob on February 9th, 2009 at 1:37 PM
 

Sorry I forgot to include the lnk to the senate

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 2nd Session

avatar Retired_Navy_Rob on February 9th, 2009 at 1:33 PM
 

Ok since you sent me a private message stating the wallstreet bailout. Lets take a look.............
Well it appears that the Democratic Party overwhelmingly voted for the bill while the Republican Party mainly voted against it. Lets take a deeper look…..It seems that the messiah voted for it. Obama (D-IL), Yea. But don’t take my word for it try researching it for yourself

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 2nd Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate


Vote Summary

Question: On Passage of the Bill (H. R. 1424 As Amended )
Vote Number: 213 Vote Date: October 1, 2008, 09:22 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5 Vote Result: Bill Passed
Measure Number: H.R. 1424 (A bill to provide authority for the Federal Government to purchase and insure certain types of troubled assets for the purposes of providing stability to and preventing disruption in the economy and financial system and protecting taxpayers, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for other purposes. )
Measure Title: A bill to provide authority for the Federal Government to purchase and insure certain types of troubled assets for the purposes of providing stability to and preventing disruption in the economy and financial system and protecting taxpayers, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for other purposes.
Vote Counts: YEAs 74
NAYs 25
Not Voting 1

See how your Senator voted at


HOUSE RESULTS


FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 681
Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)

H R 1424 YEA-AND-NAY 3-Oct-2008 1:22 PM
QUESTION: On Motion to Concur in Senate Amendments
BILL TITLE: Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008


Yeas Nays PRES NV
Democratic 172 63
Republican 91 108
Independent
TOTALS 263 171

see who voted for yourself at
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 681U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 2nd Session

avatar Retired_Navy_Rob on February 5th, 2009 at 8:58 AM
 

I just want to start out by saying I’m more of a constitutionalist then a conservative; I strongly believe that the government’s roll in our lives should be limited. Secondly from reviewing the history of your post, I see that you’re obviously a man of very few words and I’m sure you use them both often. With that said lets move on to by question to you. Last time I checked the Republican Party didn’t have the power in either side of congress to pass anything on its own. When did this vote take place and what exactly was the bill number so I can go see a roll call on who voted yea and who voted nay?

Related Articles

TO THE UNDECIDED VOTER
A Deplorable Government
Scientist: Forget Global Warming, Prepare for New Ice Age
The Post American World
Man behind the Curtain

Sphere: Related Content